Search for: "SEE, Inc. v. See Concept SAS"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2017, 6:33 am
In an important judgment handed down on 4 October 2017 in the case of Google Inc v Duffy ([2017] SASFC 130 [pdf]) the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Australia upheld the decision of Blue J ([2015] SASC 170) that Google Inc was liable for the defamatory content of the hyperlinks and paragraphs in search results on the claimant’s name (see our comment on the first instance decision). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
But a plurality rejected the "stream of commerce" concept in Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:21 am
Id. at 71; see also Maltby v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am
Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:16 am
Given the amount of wisdom it imparts, it is exceptionally good value.David's particular bugbears are evident including the fact that designs only protect visual features (not those experienced by other senses) and the identity of the informed user (for the few unfamiliar, he's not a fan of the approach taken in the infamous pogs case PepsiCo, Inc. v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic SA. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
See: C.L.B. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:21 am
Id. at 71; see also Maltby v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:58 am
Related Cases: Oracle v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 7:33 am
See, CollegeSource, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
In Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit 2010); see also U.S. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Inc.,[8] which had different facts to the case in point, and also emphasized the decision in Evans v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
In L'Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2010] EWCA Civ 535 (on which see IPKat overview here) Bellure's business model was to sell cheap 'knock off' perfumes whose smell alluded to the smell of L'Oréal 's own perfumes. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
(See Fredrics v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
See also Johnson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:19 am
The other is the recently-filed appeal of Dealer Computer Svcs., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
The trend internationally is that bidding on a keyword “would not in and of itself be sufficient to establish infringement because … it must also be shown that the advertisements did not enable the average consumer to ascertain whether the goods or services referred to originated from … [the trademark owner] or from [the advertiser]”: see lnterflora v Marks and Spencer plc, [2014] EWCA Civ. 1403 at paras. 69-70 and 192; Google France SARL v Louis… [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:09 pm
" The examiner found that such a concept was similar to the decision SmartGene, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
" The examiner found that such a concept was similar to the decision SmartGene, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
According to the dissent, that statement is dicta later repudiated in SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
